North Las Vegas Police Chief Mark Paresi got his pink slip Tuesday. Or maybe Monday. It's hard to tell because the city is being a bit secretive about the whole affair. (RJ)
Now, in a democracy, government is supposed to be transparent so that the ultimate rulers, that's us, the voters, can have enough information about what's going on so that we can make informed decisions about who to pick to run things.
In North Las Vegas, however, we get stonewalling and deflection from our elected officials when it comes to justifying their decisions.
Mayor Montandon gave us this:
"You can't portray this as a firing, but he is leaving," Montandon said.
"There are changes we need to make that both we and he feel can't be made with him at the helm," he said.
So, don't Nor'Towners get to know what those changes are and why they can't be made.
Councilgal Stephanie Smith rewarded us with the enlightening bit:
"Everybody has their strong points
and weaknesses, and unless they've done something that's egregious or a
violation of the public trust, you don't need every piece of your dirty
linen aired."
She said Paresi had improved training at the Police Department and had been a proponent of community policing.
But "it's a good time for both him and the city" for him to leave, Smith said.
So, WHY is it a good time for him to leave?
Councilguy and Mayor Pro Temp Robinson just seemed out of the loop:
Councilman William Robinson said
he did not know Paresi's current status with the city. He said the only
complaint he had with Paresi's job performance was that the chief had
not done enough to recruit more minority police officers.
"He didn't do some things I thought he should have done, but there
are a lot of (city) employees I feel that way about," Robinson said.
Nor'Towners will have to pick their next mayor based on candidate's past decisions among other things. But, as usual, we have no idea how they made the decision to fire or layoff or whatever just happened to Paresi. I can't help wondering if that's part of the reason for their being so hush-hush about the whole thing.
Or could this be the beginning of all those political firings that we were warned about and were used as the excuse for giving the city manager such a nice new shiny contract? So much for that "stability" argument.
This is one of the few instances where I actually agree with the Las Vegas Review Journal's Editorial Bored. And, no, I didn't misspell that.